The Curse of Ham: What Does Genesis Actually Say?

The Curse of Ham is a theological idea that has been used throughout history in attempts to explain slavery, racial distinctions, and even racial hierarchy. But what does the biblical text actually say?

In this episode of Conversations That Matter, Jon Harris examines Genesis 9 and the historical interpretations surrounding Ham and Canaan. Was Ham actually cursed? What was Ham's sin? Does the text support the increasingly popular maternal incest theory? Why was Canaan cursed instead of Ham? And when did the idea emerge that the Curse of Ham applied to African peoples?

We examine the biblical text, early Jewish and Christian interpretations, church history, and the later development of racial applications of this passage.

The goal is not to force modern political concerns into Scripture, but to understand Genesis on its own terms and examine the historical record honestly.

00:00 The Curse of Ham Theology Is Back

05:20 What Does Genesis 9 Actually Say?

13:55 The Maternal Incest Theory Examined

19:12 Why Was Canaan Cursed Instead of Ham?

28:30 How Jewish and Christian Writers Interpreted the Curse

35:40 When Did the Curse Become Connected to Black Skin?

39:30 The Curse of Ham and African Slavery

45:00 Modern Race and Biblical Interpretation

52:00 The Prophetic Meaning of Noah's Blessings and Curse

59:00 What Did Calvin and Other Theologians Actually Believe?

Jon's Music: jonharristunes.com

To Support the Podcast: 

https://www.jonharrismedia.com/support/

Become a Patron

https://www.patreon.com/jonharrispodcast

Substack: https://substack.com/@jonharris 

Follow Jon on Twitter: https://twitter.com/jonharris1989

Follow Jon on Facebook: 

https://www.facebook.com/jonharris1989/

Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/conversations-that-matter8971/donations

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy