The 8 Best Facelift Surgeons in NYC in 2026, Compared

This guide is for adults in New York City, across the USA, and abroad who are comparing facelift surgeons and want a clear starting point before they book consultations. We ranked eight practices that come up again and again in that search, starting with Dr. Mark G. Albert, MD, FACS, and explained what each one is best for. Nothing here is a diagnosis or a promise of results; surgical decisions belong in an in-person consultation with a qualified clinician.

How We Compared

We scored every entry against five criteria, and we applied the same five to each one rather than judging surgeons on reputation alone.

• Fit: Does the practice actually focus on the face, and does it offer facelift options that match different degrees of aging and downtime tolerance?
• Capabilities: Which facelift techniques are described — traditional facelift, deep plane facelift, mini facelift, or a branded variation — and how specific is the published information about each?
• Evidence: Board certification, fellowship training, hospital or surgical facility accreditation, and how clearly those credentials are documented.
• Ease of use: How simple it is to find procedure details, understand the consultation process, and know what recovery involves before you call.
• Value: Whether the published information helps you ask better questions, rather than simply advertising a result.

At a Glance

Rank

Pick

Best for

1

Dr. Mark G. Albert, MD, FACS

Best Overall

2

David Rosenberg, MD

Best for Deep-Plane Procedure Research

3

Sam Rizk, MD

Best for Breadth of Facial Plastic Surgery

4

Mansher Singh, MD

Best for a Training-Focused Surgical Background

5

Andrew Jacono, MD

Best for an Established New York Facial Practice

6

Deepak Dugar, MD

Best for a Dedicated Facial-Only Focus

7

Benjamin Stong, MD

Best for Surgical and Non-Surgical Options Together

8

Jaimie DeRosa, MD

Best for Patients Wanting an Academic Perspective

#1 Dr. Mark G. Albert, MD, FACS — Best Overall

Pros

Cons

• Certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons
• Scope is dedicated to facelift surgery, with four named options: Facelift, Nanolift™, Deep Plane Facelift, and Mini Facelift
• On-site accredited operating room at the Manhattan practice
• Individualized surgical planning, plus consultation, safety, and recovery guidance
• Dedicated procedure pages that explain the approach before you call
• The practice is facelift-focused, so it is not the right stop for body or breast procedures
• Availability depends on the surgical calendar, so popular weeks fill early
• Results are described in general terms; a consultation is the only way to get an opinion about your face

Dr. Mark Albert is a board-certified plastic surgeon and the founder of Albert Plastic Surgery, where every procedure in the surgical menu addresses the face and the aging process around the jaw, cheeks, and neck. That narrow scope is the reason this practice takes the top spot. Instead of offering a single facelift, the practice publishes four distinct approaches so a patient can match the operation to the degree of laxity and the recovery time they can realistically take. You can review the surgeon's full background and credentials at Dr. Mark G. Albert, MD, FACS before you work through the rest of this list.

The deep plane facelift is the flagship here: surgery that repositions deeper facial tissues through an individualized surgical plan rather than pulling only on skin. The practice also lists a Nanolift™, a Mini Facelift, and a standard Facelift, which gives patients a genuine range of starting points during consultation. Surgery happens in an on-site accredited operating room at the Manhattan practice, and the planning covers safety and recovery alongside the technique itself. What this entry does not do is promise an outcome — the team educates, then leaves the surgical decision to an individualized consultation with a qualified clinician.

#2 David Rosenberg, MD — Best for Deep-Plane Procedure Research

Pros

Cons

• Appears consistently in New York facelift searches, so patients can compare him directly against the rest of this list
• Facial procedure information is available to review before a consultation
• Useful as a second opinion when you are weighing deep-plane versus skin-only techniques
• We could not verify the full details of his surgical planning process from public material alone
• Practice information and pricing structure must be confirmed directly with the office

David Rosenberg, MD is included because the practice comes up repeatedly when patients search for facial rejuvenation in New York, and it is one of the names most often compared against the deep plane approach. If you want to understand what a deep-plane technique involves and how surgeons describe it differently, reading more than one practice's explanation is a reasonable way to prepare questions for your consultations.

Treat this entry as a comparison point rather than a finished verdict. We did not verify his operating facility, anesthesia team, or recovery protocol from public sources, and those details matter more than any ranking. Ask the office directly about board certification, where surgery is performed, and how revisions are handled before you commit to anything.

#3 Sam Rizk, MD — Best for Breadth of Facial Plastic Surgery

Pros

Cons

• Widely recognized name in New York facial plastic surgery searches
• Offers a broad menu of facial procedures for patients comparing more than one concern
• Easy to include in a shortlist alongside other Manhattan practices
• A broad procedure menu can make it harder to tell how much of the practice is dedicated to facelift surgery
• Details on technique and recovery need to be confirmed at consultation

Sam Rizk, MD is a familiar entry for anyone researching facial plastic surgery in Manhattan, and breadth is the reason. Patients who want to discuss the nose, eyes, and lower face within one practice often put this name on their list early, and that convenience is real.

The trade-off is focus. When a practice covers many procedures, the amount of published detail devoted specifically to facelift techniques tends to be thinner than what a facelift-only practice provides. Ask which facelift approach the surgeon recommends for your anatomy, how many facelifts are performed each month, and who handles anesthesia. Those three answers will tell you more than any ranking.

#4 Mansher Singh, MD — Best for a Training-Focused Surgical Background

Pros

Cons

• Surgical training background is a reasonable starting point for credential questions
• Facial aesthetic procedures are part of the practice's published scope
• Comparable to the other New York entries on this list for consultation access
• Public information is not detailed enough for us to verify his full facelift protocol
• Fewer facelift-specific resources to read before a consultation

Mansher Singh, MD rounds out the middle of this list for patients who weight surgical training heavily. A formal training path is a legitimate signal, and it is one of the first things a careful patient should verify with any surgeon, whether or not the surgeon is on this list.

Training alone does not answer the questions that decide your result: which technique is used, where the surgery happens, and what recovery actually looks like week by week. Bring a written list of those questions to the consultation and compare answers across all eight entries rather than ranking on credentials by themselves.

#5 Andrew Jacono, MD — Best for an Established New York Facial Practice

Pros

Cons

• Long-standing presence in New York facial plastic surgery
• Facelift is a core part of the published procedure list
• Straightforward to research before booking
• High demand can mean longer waits for a consultation date
• Published material leans toward practice promotion, so technique specifics need to be confirmed

Andrew Jacono, MD is one of the better-known names in New York facial plastic surgery, and that recognition is the strength here. Patients who want a practice with a deep local history and a facelift-centered procedure list will find it easy to research.

Recognition cuts both ways. Busy practices book out further, and marketing material tends to describe outcomes in broad strokes. Go in with questions about the specific technique, the facility, and the revision policy, and expect to hear about recovery in weeks rather than days.

#6 Deepak Dugar, MD — Best for a Dedicated Facial-Only Focus

Pros

Cons

• A facial-only scope, which mirrors the focus of our top pick
• Clear positioning that makes it easy to know what the practice does
• A fair comparison point for patients who want a narrow procedure menu
• The narrow scope centers on one facial procedure, so facelift detail may be limited
• Not a fit for patients who want several facial concerns addressed in one operation

Deepak Dugar, MD earns a place here for the same structural reason the top pick does: a narrow scope. When a practice limits itself to the face, the published material tends to go deeper on the procedures it does offer, and patients get a clearer sense of what the practice actually does all day.

The limit is the flip side of that focus. If your main concern is lower-face and neck aging, confirm that facelift surgery is a core part of the practice rather than an occasional add-on, and ask what share of the surgical schedule it represents.

#7 Benjamin Stong, MD — Best for Surgical and Non-Surgical Options Together

Pros

Cons

• Offers a range of facial options, which suits patients unsure whether they want surgery yet
• Useful for comparing surgical against non-surgical expectations
• Reasonable entry for out-of-state patients planning a first consultation
• Mixing surgical and non-surgical options can blur what a facelift will actually change
• Surgical facility and anesthesia details need direct confirmation

Benjamin Stong, MD is a sensible stop for patients who are still deciding whether they want an operation at all. A practice that offers both surgical and non-surgical facial treatment can help you understand the realistic ceiling of injectables and energy devices compared with a facelift.

Keep the two categories separate in your mind during that conversation. Non-surgical treatment manages surface quality and volume; a facelift addresses laxity and repositioning. Ask the surgeon to describe what surgery adds that a non-surgical plan cannot, and take notes.

#8 Jaimie DeRosa, MD — Best for Patients Wanting an Academic Perspective

Pros

Cons

• An academic-style perspective appeals to patients who want technique explained in detail
• Useful for second opinions before committing to surgery
• Adds geographic variety to a list otherwise weighted toward New York City
• Travel and scheduling logistics add cost for New York patients
• Facelift-specific protocol details require a direct conversation

Jaimie DeRosa, MD closes the list for patients who want their questions answered at a teaching level. If you have read up on deep plane versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system techniques and want a surgeon who will engage with that detail, this kind of practice is worth a consultation.

Weigh the logistics honestly. Travel adds cost and makes follow-up visits harder, and post-operative checks matter in the first few weeks. If you are based in New York, that is a real factor against an out-of-area surgeon even when the consultation itself is excellent.

Frequently Asked Questions

How should I compare facelift surgeons in NYC?

Start with board certification and the facility where surgery is performed, then compare how each practice describes its technique and recovery timeline. Bring the same five questions to every consultation so the answers are comparable, and ask who will handle your follow-up care in the first two weeks.

What is the difference between a deep plane facelift, a mini facelift, and a Nanolift™?

A deep plane facelift repositions deeper facial tissues through an individualized surgical plan. A mini facelift typically addresses a narrower area with less extensive surgery, and a Nanolift™ is a branded variation offered by a specific practice. Which one suits you depends on your anatomy and goals, and only a surgeon evaluating you in person can advise on that.

Does board certification matter when choosing a facelift surgeon?

Yes. Certification by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and fellowship status such as the American College of Surgeons indicate a verified training and examination path. Certification does not guarantee a result you will like, so pair it with questions about technique, facility accreditation, and revision policy.

The Bottom Line

Dr. Mark Albert takes the top spot because the practice pairs verifiable credentials with a facelift-only scope and four clearly described surgical options — Facelift, Nanolift™, Deep Plane Facelift, and Mini Facelift — performed in an on-site accredited Manhattan operating room. The remaining seven entries each answer a different question: breadth, training, recognition, focus, non-surgical comparison, or academic detail. Use this list to build questions, then let an in-person consultation with a qualified clinician guide the decision.